Woman asked her closed Facebook group for some alternatives to sandwiches for her husband’s lunches and is attacked by feminists

Why can’t it just be considered nice that a woman wants to make her partner a meal?

WHEN young Sydney mother Maddie asked her closed Facebook group of 26,186 mothers for some tasty alternatives to sandwiches for her husband’s lunches, she wasn’t expecting the backlash. She was attacked and abused by feminists.

“I would love to hear what other mums make their hubbies for lunch and snacks throughout the work day,” she posted on Tuesday. “We are getting over sandwiches.”

You would think she’d asked for a hemlock recipe, judging by the torrent of scolding which erupted.

She was nothing but a “slave” and a “1950s housewife”.

She was “weird” and no one in their right mind or a “pink fit” would do something so demeaning as make their husband lunch. Let alone snacks.

“Your husband is a grown up and you’re not his mother”, wrote one member of the North Shore Mums Facebook group.

“My husband can make his own damn lunch.”

“I make my husband the same thing he makes me. Nothing!!”

“Stuff that, hubby is a grown man. I already do his laundry and keep his children alive.”

“Our advice is to stop making his lunches.”

“My role is childcare during working hours and that’s it.”

“He’s lucky if I decide to make dinner some nights”.

“I was married for twenty years and my favourite packed lunch for my husband was called a Get it Yourself with a side order of I’m not your mother.”

“Nope, I didn’t sign up for that at the altar. But in the spirit of being helpful… pickled onion stuffed in mandarins.”

Leader of the attack pack was Polly Dunning, daughter of professional feminist Jane Caro, and mother of a toddler about whom she infamously wrote last year, recounting her horror at finding out she was pregnant with a boy: “I felt sick at the thought of something male growing inside me.”

Polly Dunning was not impressed when a woman requested ideas of things to pack her husband for lunch. (Pic: News Corp)

Dunning told Maddie: “You should pack him nothing for lunch. And you didn’t really ask for advice, you asked what other ‘mums’ pack their ‘hubbies’ (which, to me, is slightly weird phrasing, but whatever).”

Game on.

Amid the cute pics of babies and birthday cakes, a toxic wave of man-hating feminism is seeping into the world of mothers online.

Where unhappy wives used to confine their bitching about husbands to a handful of girlfriends at Mosman cafes, a new generation of women is oversharing with vast networks of strangers.

On Wednesday, Maddie, 22, switched off comments, but not before page administrators deleted the nastiest.

“I’m actually so devastated about some of these comments,” wrote Maddie.

She and her husband are saving up to buy their first home and, “he works in an extremely physically demanding job, he does housework, he cooks dinner every second night… He gets up in the middle of the night with our Bub. He is a champion.

“The least I can do is make him a bloody sandwich. I love my man, he deserves to eat lunch and we can’t afford to eat out.”

Dunning responded a few hours later: “We are not, any of us, just mums. Mum is one of the many roles we have as women and a role that certainly does not include doing anything for our partners because we’re not his (or her) mother. Just struck me as weird to put making a husband’s lunch with the role of Mum.”

How did making a sandwich become a crime against women? Thankfully, for everything bad about social media there is an antidote, and an army of mums sprang to Maddie’s defence.

“Is it really a massive issue if Maddie wants to make her husband lunch?!?”

“Wow, so much hostility here… Surely nice actions like these get reciprocated in happy marriages.”

“Good on you! My husband is a builder, and his job is so physical, and he is so hands on at home! It’s the least I can do.”

“I never know why these posts always turn into a husband bashing.”

 “I think it’s pretty crappy to assume someone is a slave or 1950s housewife for making lunch. Feminism is about choice.”

“All I can say is some women really must resent their husbands by their responses. Looking after your partner is the way to a happy marriage.”

“I’m so confused by the negativity on this post. I love making my hubby lunch… He does so much for us as a family and for my girls I see nothing wrong with wanting to look after your husband!!”

“If I can help in some small part to make his day easier, I will. His hours are ridiculous and if me doing this means he gets to hang out with our son more I am all for it!”

“He does so much for me and the kids. Making two sandwiches a day doesn’t put us in the dark ages.”

“Marriage is a partnership. If only more think like that there will be a lot less divorces in this world.”

This is the truth Baby Boomer feminists refuse to admit.

Consideration and give and take is the secret to a happy marriage, not treating the father of your children like an agent of the enemy patriarchy.

It’s time to end the war of the sexes, even if it means making the odd sandwich.


Women against feminism UK: Feminism is cancer. Feminism does not mean equality between the genders. In fact, feminists blame men and women against feminism for everything. Those feminists are disgusting.  Go Girl, and don’t listen to these nasty women.

It shows she loves him and wants to help support him, give and take which all marriages should  be. It’s got nothing to do with men and women, it’s about a partnership in which you help each other and love each other. Feminists are hateful and aggressive. Evil souls who want to destroy marriage and families. Lover? They don’t understand what is that.

No wonder men hate feminism so much and more women are fighting against feminism.



Don’t objectify women?Feminist lets random people finger her vagina in public


WARNING: Explicit sexual content

Feminists definitely have mental disorders. When we see a feminist protesting we can always expect something gross, illogical and stupid.

Milo Moiré, a Swiss feminist and psychologist who previously she had shoved EGGS In her vagina, has been performing controversial nude public art for years. In 2014, she rode a bus naked (painted with names of clothing items where they are supposed to go on a body) during Art Basel in Switzerland andstood naked outside an art museum in Cologne, Germany painting a white sheet red with paint-filled eggs stashed inside her vagina.

 Most recently, she paid homage to Valie Export’s 1960s nudist work and asked people in London, Düsseldorf, and Amsterdam to touch her breasts and vagina, which were concealed in a large mirrored box with a hole in the middle. She recorded the interactions, and released a highly censored (yet still pretty NSFW) video of her being touched. Moiré spoke to Cosmopolitan.com about what it was like to have strangers finger her, the ground rules she laid for those who did, and why she’d rather not have the performance labeled as a feminist piece of art.

Women Against Feminism UK:  Unbelievable.

Well, feminists are doing this to “help” women? Really?  Not in my name. 

Feminists don’t represent us. Less than 7% of the British Women consider themselves feminists and today thanks to alternative media more women are exposing feminism.

This is not art. This is not fighting for  real justice and fairness. This is plain feminist stupidity in the guise of social experiment to justify 15-minute-of-fame. This is what feminism is about: no intellectual substance. 

The old and the new feminism are the same kine of illness. No excuses.

Strangely, these idiots are often protesting against women objectification  (Beyoncé and general celebrities) but are the first ones to get naked or calling themselves sluts.

You can see how feminists “fight for us” below.




The UK is going crazy: Transgender lessons for two-year-olds? Drag queens drafted into nursery schools to teach children about “sexual diversity”

The aim of Drag Queen Story Times is, according to its website 'we aim to capture the imagination and fun of the gender fluidity of childhood while giving children a glamorous, positive unabashedly queer role model'

The UK is going crazy and the targets are our children. Why are some adults so determined to impose adult concerns and adult issues on children? What kind of political agenda is that while the NHS and people are struggling to live?


Drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools in the UK so that children as young as two can learn about transgender issues. 

The cross-dressers are reading nursery rhymes and singing specially adapted songs ‘to teach children about LGBT tolerance’.

Nursery bosses say the sessions are needed so that children can ‘see people who defy rigid gender restrictions’ and grow up to combat hate crime.

They want to target two and three-year-olds to influence them early ( what hell???), as they say at this age children have not yet developed any discriminatory ‘isms’.

The ‘performances’ are the brainchild of Thomas Canham, a Bristol University law graduate and part-time cross-dresser who dismisses traditional notions of masculinity as ‘meaningless’.

But critics last night said the sessions could ‘blind impressionable children of two and three to one of the most basic facts of human existence’.

Leading child psychotherapist Dilys Daws, co-author of the book Finding Your Way With Your Baby, feared they could sow the seeds of confusion in young children about their own sexual identity, with long-term consequences.

She said: ‘There’s this idea that’s sweeping the country that being transgender is an “ordinary situation”. It’s getting so much publicity that it’s getting children thinking that they might be transgender, when it otherwise wouldn’t have occurred to them.

‘But it’s perfectly normal for most young children to think about being the opposite sex. It’s probably because they are identifying with a parent or sibling.’

Norman Wells, director of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘One of the most disturbing things about the transgender agenda is the way that it tries to distort our perception of reality and deny something as fundamental as the distinction between male and female.’

Mr Canham’s organisation Drag Queen Story Time (DQST) is holding sessions at seven nurseries run by the London Early Years Foundation over the winter. If deemed successful, they will be rolled out across all the nursery’s 37 sites.

The chain receives taxpayer cash as many of its children qualify for Government-funded childcare. Besides reading to the children, sessions so far have included a ‘Halloween drag disco’, face painting and ‘high tea’.

Drag queens at DQST include Donna La Mode, who wears a ginger wig and is described as ‘the Fairy Queen of the drag world’, and ‘hyperactive’ Aida.

Mr Canham, 26, started his organisation earlier this year after reading about a similar outfit in the US. He said: ‘Once you think about the idea – which is essentially drag queens reading stories to children – it all makes perfect sense.

He said he wanted to create a ‘safe space’ where adults or children would not be criticised for ‘wearing a dress’. His drag queens had ‘complete control’ over their performances, he added.

‘They can include, for example, drag queen references within songs. So if you’re doing something like Wheels On The Bus, you can sing, “The skirt on the drag queen goes swish, swish, swish.”

‘The parents love it, and the children love it too – especially when you’ve got a six-year-old boy there in a princess dress which he isn’t allowed to wear at home because his dad doesn’t like it.’

His drag queens also had ‘a library with books which focus on LGBT rights, feminist fairy tales and trans-rights issues,’ said Mr Canham, the son of a British Army soldier.

‘On trans-themes, we’ve got a book called Introducing Teddy where the teddy realises she’s a girl teddy, not a boy teddy, and is worried her owner won’t like her any more. It’s a cute book,’ he said.

Women against feminism:  This is a crime. Insane brainwashing. No chance of children being children, just adults forcing adult issues upon minds that cannot understand what it is all about. What kind of political agenda is that and what kind of person is able to to this?

Meanwhile the NHS has got “no money” for cancer treatment and serious conditions  but……..Just last week we revealed how the NHS is planning on training up hundreds of HPs as transgender 'champions'

Parents, protect your children. Don’t be afraid of political correctness.

BBC and feminists destroying the masculinity in the UK: blaming all men because of some and closing the eyes for women’s mistakes.


If feminism is cancer, the BBC is one of the that evil things that is helping spread cancer.

The episode BBC Newsnight  yesterday was a special titled “The problem with men” (clear message from the BBC: all men are problematic and guilty. Could you imagine a program where women would be called problematic??) where members of the public, journalists and celebrities were brought on to discuss what constitutes sexual harassment of women. The same old  feminist story: women are angels, men are evil.

These are the people that are promoting “equality and justice for all”, right?? Unbelievable.

It comes amid weeks of allegations of sexual abuse involving Harvey Weinstein, an alleged rape of a Labour Party campaigner and the resignation of Defence Minister Michael Fallon who “inappropriately touched” journalist Julia Hartley-Brewer. If you watched TV and listened radio this last week this was the main topic.

Men were judged like animals and monsters by the BBC, feminists and journalists. Animals who exploit their power in order to “serve their craving for sex and for women”.

Some of members of the public on the panel argued that the recent allegations of sexual harassment have meant men cannot be as “friendly” with female friends and they can no longer “hug”, or “touch” them. It is a fair point. An american actor touched the leg of an actress and friend few days ago and feminist went crazy. The same actress posted on her social media defending the actor immediately after this hysteric event.

One member of the public also made the point that some women can be abusive too and cited the case of Jemma Beale who lied about 15 rapes to get sympathy. The black feminist Eliza Anyangwe was laughing while one member of the public was defending his argument.
We agree that rapists and criminals (women, men, gays, lesbians, transgenders, you can name) IF PROVED must be punished without mercy BUT we should carefully analyse the various demands in light of these allegations. It must be analysed and proved. Innocents were sent to jail because this old feminist tactic.
Erin Pizzey’s words: Yes, some men are rapists and sexual predators so are some women and they should be prosecuted but much of what is happening now is a #bitch hunt.
My main concern is that like our schools, our universities,our family services and the judiciary men will move out and the loss of men will be a loss to us all.
We also should not forget how feminists fight for power. This story is following a classic technique:

1. Overblow allegations of sexism (or racism, or homophobia).
2. Attempt to induce into every man, white person or straight person reading that they’re a sexist, racist or homophobe, even if they’re not, and that they should feel guilty and apologetic for it, even if they have nothing to be guilty about.
3. Similarly, induce paranoia into the opposite identity group (women, ethnic minorities, gays) that men, white people or straight people are all sexist, racist or homophobic.
4. Use the guilt of the particular identity group, and paranoia of the opposite identity group, to push for further discriminatory legislation against the offending group and in favour of the victim group, such as all-female shortlists.

Female student ‘too clever to be jailed’ walks free after stabbing boyfriend


Do you remember Lavinia Woodward, 24, the Oxford student who has a history of cocaine and MDMA abuse and plunged a bread knife into Thomas Fairclough’s leg (boyfriend)? We wrote about her.

Well, our society obsessed with equality ruled by judges as Judge Ian Pringle thinks “some animals are more equal than others”.

Woodward — awarded the highest first for many years at Christ Church college — also threw a laptop and glass jars at Mr Fairclough, who needed four stitches in his wound.

Despite Woodward admitting unlawful wounding at a hearing in May, judge Ian Pringle described her as ‘an extraordinary young lady’.

He acknowledged the stabbing would normally result in a prison term, either immediate or suspended. But he said he would delay sentence, saying hindering her career prospects would be ‘too severe’. The court heard that the student had already had articles published in medical journals.

Yesterday Woodward walked free from Oxford crown court with a ten-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months.


Suspended sentence: Judge Ian Pringle

Defending, James Sturman QC said Woodward had checked into rehab and moved to Italy after the court appearance in May but on returning to the UK lost a job in 48 hours after being recognised for being in trouble.

He said she would be going back into rehab after the case ended and had given up hope of returning to Oxford this year due to the publicity. He added: ‘The university remain supportive, thent enough’ to realise that ‘over-indulgence’ with alcohol would influence her behaviour. Wearing a white blouse, black trouser suit and black pumps, Woodward ran from court after the hearing.

Mr Fairclough, who she met on Tinder eight months before the attack, was not in court.y are here today.’

He said she was considering whether to do a PhD abroad or look for a research role at another university.

Judge Pringle said Woodward had shown remorse and a ‘strong and unwavering determination’ to get rid of her addictions and eating disorder. She had no previous convictions and was ‘intelligent enough’ to realise that ‘over-indulgence’ with alcohol would influence her behaviour. Wearing a white blouse, black trouser suit and black pumps, Woodward ran from court after the hearing.

Mr Fairclough, who she met on Tinder eight months before the attack, was not in court.

Women Against Feminism UK: The justice puts criminal women above the law. The same won’t happen when a man is a criminal. We think a criminal is a criminal and must be punished as such. It does not matter the gender, colour or social class.

Criminal women are privileged and AGAIN the law is protecting criminal women. What kind of example is that for our society? What kind of equality is that?

10 years for woman who falsely accused nine men of rape


A criminal woman who falsely accused nine men of rape  to get attention from her girlfriend (she is lesbian) was jailed for ten years yesterday after police spent more than £250,000 investigating her lies. 

What feminists think about lesbianism? Read here. 

Jemma Beale (pictured), one of whose victims was wrongly convicted and spent nearly three years in prison, was told her actions had increased the chances of genuine attackers going free.

In fact, feminists have been promoting false rape accusations for the last 25 years and we still can see it today.  Read our article about that.

‘Cases such as this bring a real risk that a woman who has been raped or sexually assaulted may not complain to the police for fear of not being believed,’ Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith said as he sentenced her.

‘You are a very, very convincing liar and you enjoy being seen as a victim.

‘What is particularly chilling is the manner in which you persisted in making allegations which you knew were untrue, even to the extent of committing and repeating perjury.’

Beale, who continues to protest her innocence, was convicted last month of four counts of perjury and four of perverting the course of justice.

Jurors heard the 25-year-old falsely claimed to have been raped by nine men and sexually assaulted by six, all strangers, in four encounters over three years. She lied to get sympathy from her girlfriend, Southwark crown court heard.

Before Mahad Cassim was jailed for raping her in 2010, she told a judge no punishment could ‘reflect the life sentence he gave me’.

Mr Cassim, 37, overturned his conviction — having served two years and nine months — after police noticed flaws in Beale’s later allegations and began investigating her.

He told her trial she ruined his life but he now wanted to ‘have a nice family and be happy’, adding: ‘I am working on the happiness — I have a long way to go.’

Officers spent 6,500 hours on Beale’s claims and the cost to the taxpayer was added to by her trial, which cost £109,000.

The attention-seeker — who faked injury in a bid to convince police — has had ‘vile’ comments made about her online, her lawyer said.

Is the UK Legal System directed by feminists putting women above the law? Read our article above

Read more here about this vile woman

Women against feminism UK: Finally some justice although we think she should be punished more severely. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable. First, feminist women like this damage innocent lives. Innocent men have been sent to jail because evil women are affected by feminism and their words are above the law. Second,  their feminist actions increase the chances of genuine attackers going free.


Brainwashing British children: BBC 2 “No More Boys and Girls: Can Our Kids Go Gender-Free” is insanity and political correctness attacking British families


What is worse than brainwashing children, destroying their future and dreams? Well, the National Socialism did it during the II World War and now BBC 2 is doing it again in 2017.

No More Boys and Girls: Can Our Kids Go Gender Free? is the BBC’s latest contribution to ‘identity theft’ and to promote the BBC’s agenda (feminist agenda). BBC-2 aired the first of two programmes on Wednesday evening. Its basic premise was that boys dominate girls from an early age because of gender stereotyping and that girls suffer as a result. Watching  the first episodes the message is clear: we must be equal. Differences are not tolerated in the UK. Boys, husbands and men are bad.

The primary school chosen was on the Isle of Wight – a low performing education authority. There was no obvious presence in the Year 3 class chosen of any of our most hardworking and successful pupils – recent immigrants and those from ethnic minorities. Can anyone imagine the BBC trying this in a majority Muslim school?

Dr Javid Abdelmonein, “the crazy scientist” who presented the programme uses children as guinea pigs and appears to take it as a ‘given’ that girls underperform because of the boys. He failed to mention that in SATs tests at 7 and 11, at GCSE age 16, at A-Level aged 18, and at university degree level, girls consistently outperform boys.

He also demonises men (fathers) and does not hide his agenda putting women as “oppressed hard worker victims”. Men are the lazy villains. He failed to mention that physical and dangerous jobs are still done by men (many poor and illiterate).

We don’t know if the crazy scientist who is brainwashing the British children is a father. If he is, we fell very sorry for his (would he be her?) children.

British TV is not the best in the world. TV normally is full of rubbish but this programme (which is essentially child abuse) is the worst programme ever.

Viewers caught a glimpse of this when Lexi, clearly a sensitive 7-year-old girl, became upset and tearful after she successfully completed the ‘strength test’. She was told that she must agree that her tears were tears of joy. Her distress, however, was obvious and worrying.  Advancing the cause of political correctness is no excuse for child cruelty. A little boy named Riley suffered an even more obvious emotional collapse when he failed to register any score at all on the same ‘strength test’.

The crazy scientist who is brainwashing this poor children force them to use mixed gender toilets. All children ARE NOT HAPPY and a poor girl said that she holds her pee and poo all day because she is not happy with the mixed toilet.

Sincerely, as a mother, I would refuse consent for my children to take part in “research” like this. Parents that do it with their children don’t love them or are brainwashed idiots by PC. If I were a teacher, I would refuse to take part in what is essentially child abuse.

As parents, we should stand up for our little children. It is not right to brainwashing children because this stupid myth of equality must be accepted without questions.  This myth we can see in North Korea, Venezuela and Cuba maybe not regarding gender but using equality and another “kind of magical and intellectual” idea that looks great on paper but it  just doesn’t work in real life.

If you want to watch a good documentary about gender the best one is The Gender Equality Paradox. This documentary actually made Norway to remove funding from the gender studies institute in the country.


People are not bricks or zombies. Individual skills, personalities and abilities should be encouraged from the beginning but for some reason the word different is offensive in 2017. We are not equal  and men and women are not equal. Furthermore, people from the same gender are also not equal. These SJWs who want to force people and now children are clear about their “transgender lobby”. Now they are targeting children 5year-old.

Parents, stand up. Don’t leave these idiots brainwash your children.