The gender gap is a feminist myth: It is illegal to pay less based on gender

No automatic alt text available.

The gender gap is a popular feminist myth in the UK.

Feminist media and feminists journalists sell lies. It is illegal to pay less based on gender in the UK. People who claim it is real fail to explain how.

Your salary is a combination of factors: taxes paid, supply and demand, skills, how you negotiate your salary and so on.

It is simplistic assumption to tell men, women, black, white or whoever you want that they are victims and are paid less based on gender or race.

If you are unhappy with your job it is time to change it. If you do not want to have a boss, open your own business and see how difficult it is.

We bet that colleagues from the same gender than you are not paid the same due to the factors described above.

Furthermore, business companies must have profit to survive. They are not your friends or your families to give you money for free. They have to survive and have some profit to creates jobs.

Can you seen that economics is not based on gender but in important several factors?


The UK is going crazy: British teacher fired for praising students, saying ‘Well Done, Girls’

Teacher guilty of "Misgendering" student

Is the UK the new leftist paradise? Unfortunately, yes. Sad sorry state of the UK in 2017. 

See below:

A math teacher was fired for saying “well done, girls” while talking to a transgender student at an Oxfordshire secondary school in England.

Joshua Sutcliffe, 27, who worked at the school for two years, said “well done, girls” while praising two students in his class. Both students are biologically female, however, one of them claims to be male.

Although he apologized to the student after being corrected, the girl’s parents complained to the school. Considering the parents were the complainants, it’s very likely the girl has simply been forced to live as a boy.

“I was absolutely shocked to be told by the head that I was under investigation. I didn’t know what was happening. It was surreal, Kafkaesque,” he told the Daily Mail. “I had always tried to respect the pupil and keep a professional attitude as well as my integrity, but it seemed to me that the school was trying to force me to adhere to its liberal, leftist agenda.”

During the disciplinary hearing, Sutcliffe was charged with misconduct for “misgendering” the student, and “avoidance of using gendered pronouns,” which the school claims, “contravenes the school’s code of conduct with regard to demonstrating an awareness of [the] sexual and cultural diversity of students and use of insensitive comments towards young people.”

According to the math teacher, no official instructions on how to refer to the girl were given by the school, so he, like other teachers, chose to call the girl by name. He did admit that as a Christian, he avoided using the preferred pronouns of the child.

Sutcliffe’s faith was seemingly another target of the school.

The 27-year-old is also a pastor at an evangelical church in Oxford. He told the Daily Mail that several years ago he conducted a voluntary Bible club during lunchtimes at the school.

Earlier this year, after Sutcliffe answered a question on marriage by explaining that the Bible describes it to be between a man and a woman, the club was shut down due to complaints of homophobia.

Women against feminism UK: There is a liberal, leftist agenda. It is crystal clear.  The person who should be tolerant is the one that want us to believe they are something THEY ARE NOT.  The leftist world “regime” is just seriously screwing up this planet. Is there anything these half witted twit-weeds won’t call high crimes and misdemeanours? Everything is a damned crisis hinged on race or gender. Why???

How many teachers will start leaving the profession? Where are the rights of the teacher to say whatever he wants to say? So now we all have to live in fear for our jobs when we address someone by wrong gender? What is wrong with people?

This is so wrong on every level and dangerous as well. 

Trans people claim they want equal rights and yet here’s another example of them demanding special rights. Had there been one boy in the group he was addressing as girls, would he have been fired for misgendering that boy? 

Another question: What the hell is a “boy” doing in an all girls school? If she identifies as a boy he/she has no right being in a single sex school of the opposite gender she/he believes to be, right?

Where are these social justice warriors when Muslims kill gays? Why are these social justice warriors attacking gay conservatives (Milo Yiannopoulos)? The Labour candidate denies the existence of ISIS, so obviously the persecution of Christians is inevitable.


Woman asked her closed Facebook group for some alternatives to sandwiches for her husband’s lunches and is attacked by feminists

Why can’t it just be considered nice that a woman wants to make her partner a meal?

WHEN young Sydney mother Maddie asked her closed Facebook group of 26,186 mothers for some tasty alternatives to sandwiches for her husband’s lunches, she wasn’t expecting the backlash. She was attacked and abused by feminists.

“I would love to hear what other mums make their hubbies for lunch and snacks throughout the work day,” she posted on Tuesday. “We are getting over sandwiches.”

You would think she’d asked for a hemlock recipe, judging by the torrent of scolding which erupted.

She was nothing but a “slave” and a “1950s housewife”.

She was “weird” and no one in their right mind or a “pink fit” would do something so demeaning as make their husband lunch. Let alone snacks.

“Your husband is a grown up and you’re not his mother”, wrote one member of the North Shore Mums Facebook group.

“My husband can make his own damn lunch.”

“I make my husband the same thing he makes me. Nothing!!”

“Stuff that, hubby is a grown man. I already do his laundry and keep his children alive.”

“Our advice is to stop making his lunches.”

“My role is childcare during working hours and that’s it.”

“He’s lucky if I decide to make dinner some nights”.

“I was married for twenty years and my favourite packed lunch for my husband was called a Get it Yourself with a side order of I’m not your mother.”

“Nope, I didn’t sign up for that at the altar. But in the spirit of being helpful… pickled onion stuffed in mandarins.”

Leader of the attack pack was Polly Dunning, daughter of professional feminist Jane Caro, and mother of a toddler about whom she infamously wrote last year, recounting her horror at finding out she was pregnant with a boy: “I felt sick at the thought of something male growing inside me.”

Polly Dunning was not impressed when a woman requested ideas of things to pack her husband for lunch. (Pic: News Corp)

Dunning told Maddie: “You should pack him nothing for lunch. And you didn’t really ask for advice, you asked what other ‘mums’ pack their ‘hubbies’ (which, to me, is slightly weird phrasing, but whatever).”

Game on.

Amid the cute pics of babies and birthday cakes, a toxic wave of man-hating feminism is seeping into the world of mothers online.

Where unhappy wives used to confine their bitching about husbands to a handful of girlfriends at Mosman cafes, a new generation of women is oversharing with vast networks of strangers.

On Wednesday, Maddie, 22, switched off comments, but not before page administrators deleted the nastiest.

“I’m actually so devastated about some of these comments,” wrote Maddie.

She and her husband are saving up to buy their first home and, “he works in an extremely physically demanding job, he does housework, he cooks dinner every second night… He gets up in the middle of the night with our Bub. He is a champion.

“The least I can do is make him a bloody sandwich. I love my man, he deserves to eat lunch and we can’t afford to eat out.”

Dunning responded a few hours later: “We are not, any of us, just mums. Mum is one of the many roles we have as women and a role that certainly does not include doing anything for our partners because we’re not his (or her) mother. Just struck me as weird to put making a husband’s lunch with the role of Mum.”

How did making a sandwich become a crime against women? Thankfully, for everything bad about social media there is an antidote, and an army of mums sprang to Maddie’s defence.

“Is it really a massive issue if Maddie wants to make her husband lunch?!?”

“Wow, so much hostility here… Surely nice actions like these get reciprocated in happy marriages.”

“Good on you! My husband is a builder, and his job is so physical, and he is so hands on at home! It’s the least I can do.”

“I never know why these posts always turn into a husband bashing.”

 “I think it’s pretty crappy to assume someone is a slave or 1950s housewife for making lunch. Feminism is about choice.”

“All I can say is some women really must resent their husbands by their responses. Looking after your partner is the way to a happy marriage.”

“I’m so confused by the negativity on this post. I love making my hubby lunch… He does so much for us as a family and for my girls I see nothing wrong with wanting to look after your husband!!”

“If I can help in some small part to make his day easier, I will. His hours are ridiculous and if me doing this means he gets to hang out with our son more I am all for it!”

“He does so much for me and the kids. Making two sandwiches a day doesn’t put us in the dark ages.”

“Marriage is a partnership. If only more think like that there will be a lot less divorces in this world.”

This is the truth Baby Boomer feminists refuse to admit.

Consideration and give and take is the secret to a happy marriage, not treating the father of your children like an agent of the enemy patriarchy.

It’s time to end the war of the sexes, even if it means making the odd sandwich.


Women against feminism UK: Feminism is cancer. Feminism does not mean equality between the genders. In fact, feminists blame men and women against feminism for everything. Those feminists are disgusting.  Go Girl, and don’t listen to these nasty women.

It shows she loves him and wants to help support him, give and take which all marriages should  be. It’s got nothing to do with men and women, it’s about a partnership in which you help each other and love each other. Feminists are hateful and aggressive. Evil souls who want to destroy marriage and families. Lover? They don’t understand what is that.

No wonder men hate feminism so much and more women are fighting against feminism.


Don’t objectify women?Feminist lets random people finger her vagina in public


WARNING: Explicit sexual content

Feminists definitely have mental disorders. When we see a feminist protesting we can always expect something gross, illogical and stupid.

Milo Moiré, a Swiss feminist and psychologist who previously she had shoved EGGS In her vagina, has been performing controversial nude public art for years. In 2014, she rode a bus naked (painted with names of clothing items where they are supposed to go on a body) during Art Basel in Switzerland andstood naked outside an art museum in Cologne, Germany painting a white sheet red with paint-filled eggs stashed inside her vagina.

 Most recently, she paid homage to Valie Export’s 1960s nudist work and asked people in London, Düsseldorf, and Amsterdam to touch her breasts and vagina, which were concealed in a large mirrored box with a hole in the middle. She recorded the interactions, and released a highly censored (yet still pretty NSFW) video of her being touched. Moiré spoke to about what it was like to have strangers finger her, the ground rules she laid for those who did, and why she’d rather not have the performance labeled as a feminist piece of art.

Women Against Feminism UK:  Unbelievable.

Well, feminists are doing this to “help” women? Really?  Not in my name. 

Feminists don’t represent us. Less than 7% of the British Women consider themselves feminists and today thanks to alternative media more women are exposing feminism.

This is not art. This is not fighting for  real justice and fairness. This is plain feminist stupidity in the guise of social experiment to justify 15-minute-of-fame. This is what feminism is about: no intellectual substance. 

The old and the new feminism are the same kine of illness. No excuses.

Strangely, these idiots are often protesting against women objectification  (Beyoncé and general celebrities) but are the first ones to get naked or calling themselves sluts.

You can see how feminists “fight for us” below.



The UK is going crazy: Transgender lessons for two-year-olds? Drag queens drafted into nursery schools to teach children about “sexual diversity”

The aim of Drag Queen Story Times is, according to its website 'we aim to capture the imagination and fun of the gender fluidity of childhood while giving children a glamorous, positive unabashedly queer role model'

The UK is going crazy and the targets are our children. Why are some adults so determined to impose adult concerns and adult issues on children? What kind of political agenda is that while the NHS and people are struggling to live?


Drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools in the UK so that children as young as two can learn about transgender issues. 

The cross-dressers are reading nursery rhymes and singing specially adapted songs ‘to teach children about LGBT tolerance’.

Nursery bosses say the sessions are needed so that children can ‘see people who defy rigid gender restrictions’ and grow up to combat hate crime.

They want to target two and three-year-olds to influence them early ( what hell???), as they say at this age children have not yet developed any discriminatory ‘isms’.

The ‘performances’ are the brainchild of Thomas Canham, a Bristol University law graduate and part-time cross-dresser who dismisses traditional notions of masculinity as ‘meaningless’.

But critics last night said the sessions could ‘blind impressionable children of two and three to one of the most basic facts of human existence’.

Leading child psychotherapist Dilys Daws, co-author of the book Finding Your Way With Your Baby, feared they could sow the seeds of confusion in young children about their own sexual identity, with long-term consequences.

She said: ‘There’s this idea that’s sweeping the country that being transgender is an “ordinary situation”. It’s getting so much publicity that it’s getting children thinking that they might be transgender, when it otherwise wouldn’t have occurred to them.

‘But it’s perfectly normal for most young children to think about being the opposite sex. It’s probably because they are identifying with a parent or sibling.’

Norman Wells, director of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘One of the most disturbing things about the transgender agenda is the way that it tries to distort our perception of reality and deny something as fundamental as the distinction between male and female.’

Mr Canham’s organisation Drag Queen Story Time (DQST) is holding sessions at seven nurseries run by the London Early Years Foundation over the winter. If deemed successful, they will be rolled out across all the nursery’s 37 sites.

The chain receives taxpayer cash as many of its children qualify for Government-funded childcare. Besides reading to the children, sessions so far have included a ‘Halloween drag disco’, face painting and ‘high tea’.

Drag queens at DQST include Donna La Mode, who wears a ginger wig and is described as ‘the Fairy Queen of the drag world’, and ‘hyperactive’ Aida.

Mr Canham, 26, started his organisation earlier this year after reading about a similar outfit in the US. He said: ‘Once you think about the idea – which is essentially drag queens reading stories to children – it all makes perfect sense.

He said he wanted to create a ‘safe space’ where adults or children would not be criticised for ‘wearing a dress’. His drag queens had ‘complete control’ over their performances, he added.

‘They can include, for example, drag queen references within songs. So if you’re doing something like Wheels On The Bus, you can sing, “The skirt on the drag queen goes swish, swish, swish.”

‘The parents love it, and the children love it too – especially when you’ve got a six-year-old boy there in a princess dress which he isn’t allowed to wear at home because his dad doesn’t like it.’

His drag queens also had ‘a library with books which focus on LGBT rights, feminist fairy tales and trans-rights issues,’ said Mr Canham, the son of a British Army soldier.

‘On trans-themes, we’ve got a book called Introducing Teddy where the teddy realises she’s a girl teddy, not a boy teddy, and is worried her owner won’t like her any more. It’s a cute book,’ he said.

Women against feminism:  This is a crime. Insane brainwashing. No chance of children being children, just adults forcing adult issues upon minds that cannot understand what it is all about. What kind of political agenda is that and what kind of person is able to to this?

Meanwhile the NHS has got “no money” for cancer treatment and serious conditions  but……..Just last week we revealed how the NHS is planning on training up hundreds of HPs as transgender 'champions'

Parents, protect your children. Don’t be afraid of political correctness.

BBC and feminists destroying the masculinity in the UK: blaming all men because of some and closing the eyes for women’s mistakes.


If feminism is cancer, the BBC is one of the that evil things that is helping spread cancer.

The episode BBC Newsnight  yesterday was a special titled “The problem with men” (clear message from the BBC: all men are problematic and guilty. Could you imagine a program where women would be called problematic??) where members of the public, journalists and celebrities were brought on to discuss what constitutes sexual harassment of women. The same old  feminist story: women are angels, men are evil.

These are the people that are promoting “equality and justice for all”, right?? Unbelievable.

It comes amid weeks of allegations of sexual abuse involving Harvey Weinstein, an alleged rape of a Labour Party campaigner and the resignation of Defence Minister Michael Fallon who “inappropriately touched” journalist Julia Hartley-Brewer. If you watched TV and listened radio this last week this was the main topic.

Men were judged like animals and monsters by the BBC, feminists and journalists. Animals who exploit their power in order to “serve their craving for sex and for women”.

Some of members of the public on the panel argued that the recent allegations of sexual harassment have meant men cannot be as “friendly” with female friends and they can no longer “hug”, or “touch” them. It is a fair point. An american actor touched the leg of an actress and friend few days ago and feminist went crazy. The same actress posted on her social media defending the actor immediately after this hysteric event.

One member of the public also made the point that some women can be abusive too and cited the case of Jemma Beale who lied about 15 rapes to get sympathy. The black feminist Eliza Anyangwe was laughing while one member of the public was defending his argument.
We agree that rapists and criminals (women, men, gays, lesbians, transgenders, you can name) IF PROVED must be punished without mercy BUT we should carefully analyse the various demands in light of these allegations. It must be analysed and proved. Innocents were sent to jail because this old feminist tactic.
Erin Pizzey’s words: Yes, some men are rapists and sexual predators so are some women and they should be prosecuted but much of what is happening now is a #bitch hunt.
My main concern is that like our schools, our universities,our family services and the judiciary men will move out and the loss of men will be a loss to us all.
We also should not forget how feminists fight for power. This story is following a classic technique:

1. Overblow allegations of sexism (or racism, or homophobia).
2. Attempt to induce into every man, white person or straight person reading that they’re a sexist, racist or homophobe, even if they’re not, and that they should feel guilty and apologetic for it, even if they have nothing to be guilty about.
3. Similarly, induce paranoia into the opposite identity group (women, ethnic minorities, gays) that men, white people or straight people are all sexist, racist or homophobic.
4. Use the guilt of the particular identity group, and paranoia of the opposite identity group, to push for further discriminatory legislation against the offending group and in favour of the victim group, such as all-female shortlists.

Female student ‘too clever to be jailed’ walks free after stabbing boyfriend


Do you remember Lavinia Woodward, 24, the Oxford student who has a history of cocaine and MDMA abuse and plunged a bread knife into Thomas Fairclough’s leg (boyfriend)? We wrote about her.

Well, our society obsessed with equality ruled by judges as Judge Ian Pringle thinks “some animals are more equal than others”.

Woodward — awarded the highest first for many years at Christ Church college — also threw a laptop and glass jars at Mr Fairclough, who needed four stitches in his wound.

Despite Woodward admitting unlawful wounding at a hearing in May, judge Ian Pringle described her as ‘an extraordinary young lady’.

He acknowledged the stabbing would normally result in a prison term, either immediate or suspended. But he said he would delay sentence, saying hindering her career prospects would be ‘too severe’. The court heard that the student had already had articles published in medical journals.

Yesterday Woodward walked free from Oxford crown court with a ten-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months.


Suspended sentence: Judge Ian Pringle

Defending, James Sturman QC said Woodward had checked into rehab and moved to Italy after the court appearance in May but on returning to the UK lost a job in 48 hours after being recognised for being in trouble.

He said she would be going back into rehab after the case ended and had given up hope of returning to Oxford this year due to the publicity. He added: ‘The university remain supportive, thent enough’ to realise that ‘over-indulgence’ with alcohol would influence her behaviour. Wearing a white blouse, black trouser suit and black pumps, Woodward ran from court after the hearing.

Mr Fairclough, who she met on Tinder eight months before the attack, was not in court.y are here today.’

He said she was considering whether to do a PhD abroad or look for a research role at another university.

Judge Pringle said Woodward had shown remorse and a ‘strong and unwavering determination’ to get rid of her addictions and eating disorder. She had no previous convictions and was ‘intelligent enough’ to realise that ‘over-indulgence’ with alcohol would influence her behaviour. Wearing a white blouse, black trouser suit and black pumps, Woodward ran from court after the hearing.

Mr Fairclough, who she met on Tinder eight months before the attack, was not in court.

Women Against Feminism UK: The justice puts criminal women above the law. The same won’t happen when a man is a criminal. We think a criminal is a criminal and must be punished as such. It does not matter the gender, colour or social class.

Criminal women are privileged and AGAIN the law is protecting criminal women. What kind of example is that for our society? What kind of equality is that?