Feminist silence and vagina pass: ex-girlfriend threw acid over man. She said ‘If I can’t have you, no-one else can’

Berlinah Wallace (pictured), 48, is accused of murdering her ex-boyfriend Mark Van Dongen, 29, after she attacked him with acid, which led him to go to suicide clinic 

We do have some attacks with guns in the UK. Knives? For sure. Acid attacks? Certainly.

Self-defence is always a formidable argument when talking about guns. Sometimes we think it might be a good idea having guns in British soil (currently is against the law). But after second thoughts is clear that is not the best answer. “Why”? Could you ask.

The answer: British people are extremely violent and poor educated when dealing with self-defence. Some Brits can mock our Americans cousins but if  you have been to America you know how they take guns handling seriously. We have got several issues without guns here in the UK, can you imagine it with guns? Pub fights would be fought with guns.

Well, let’s see another case of acid attack. It is NOT a case of self-defence. It is an evil act, however, it shows how people can be cruel if they want and how they will find whatever way to do it if they are committed.

Ex-girlfriend threw acid over man. The man, an engineer who killed himself just over a year after this evil act.

Mark Van Dongen, 29, was left almost unrecognisable after being doused in acid in the early hours of September 23 2015.

His former lover Berlinah Wallace, 48, is accused of creeping in on him while he was asleep and saying ‘If I can’t have you, no one else can’ before throwing the corrosive liquid in his face.

Dutch-born Mr Van Dongen was left blind in one eye, unable to move his body from the neck down and he had to have one of his lower legs amputated.

After 15 months of pain he decided he could no longer take it and died at a euthanasia clinic in Belgium, where his family lived, in January last year.

Wallace, a fashion student, is on trial at Bristol Crown Court for her former partner’s murder.

But jurors heard today there are ‘two sides to every story’ and her defence team claimed Mr Van Dongen had put the acid in a glass so she would drink it.

Adam Vaitilingam QC, prosecuting, told the jury South African national Wallace carried out the alleged attack at her flat in Westbury Park, Bristol.

He said: ‘On September 2 2015, the defendant had bought a bottle of sulphuric acid. She kept it in her kitchen.

At around 3am on September 23, as Mr Van Dongen was sleeping in bed, she took the acid into the bedroom.

‘She then went into the bedroom and woke him up.

‘She laughed and said ‘If I can’t have you, no-one else can’, and she threw the glass of sulphuric acid into his face.

‘It covered his face and parts of his upper body and dripped on to his lower body as he moved about.

‘Covered in burning acid, Mr Van Dongen ran out into the street in his boxer shorts, screaming for help.’

A neighbour took him upstairs, put him in a shower and called 999, and he was taken to Southmead Hospital, the court heard.

‘The injuries that he suffered were grotesque and horrific.

‘His face and much of his body was grotesquely scarred,’ the prosecutor added.

‘He lost the sight in his left eye and most of the sight in his right eye. He lost his lower left leg, which was amputated.

‘He was confined to a hospital bed, for a long time unable to move anything other than his tongue.

‘His physical condition improved a little – he regained the power of speech, though never the ability to move.

‘But 15 months later, deciding that he could bear it no longer, he asked a euthanasia clinic in Belgium to assist him in taking his own life.

‘He was examined by three consultants, who confirmed that this was, in their terms, a case of unbearable physical and psychological suffering despite maximum medical support.

‘They agreed the test for euthanasia was met, and on January 2 2017 they inserted a catheter into his heart, which brought about his immediate death.’

Wallace, of Westbury Park, Bristol, denies murder and applying a corrosive fluid with intent.

‘It is the prosecution case that the defendant deliberately threw acid at Mr Van Dongen, intending to cause him serious harm,’ Mr Vaitilingam added.

‘She admits throwing it but denies any intent to cause him harm. She says that she believed that what she was throwing over him was a glass of water.

‘It is the prosecution case that the physical and mental suffering that he sustained from that deliberate acid attack were what drove him to euthanasia.

‘Put simply, he could not bear to live in that condition. If that is right, we say, then she is guilty of murder.’

Later, the jury were shown harrowing video footage where Mr Van Dongen was interviewed by police in hospital.

He confirmed he shared a rented flat with Wallace where they had lived for five years, and that he arrived at about 6pm when she was there.

Mr Van Dongen told police he had been asleep in bed when Wallace woke him up and said: ‘If I can’t have you, no-one can.’

He recalled there being a square plastic box with an inch of acid in.

‘I was wearing just boxer shorts. She threw acid. I was crying “Help!”

‘I was running in the street. Neighbours took me into a house and called police.’

When asked why Wallace threw the acid over him, he said: ‘It was because she was jealous.’

Neighbours in Bristol were woken by the noises of a man in distress and went to his aid, not knowing whether it was a prank or someone on drugs.

Thomas Sweet went to assist and said the man was saying something about having acid thrown on him.

‘It looked like paint and he was talking about acid. I thought he had taken some acid and had been at a rave and had a bad time.

‘He said “I need a shower”. Clearly, he was in a bad way.’

Mr Sweet was joined by other neighbours and they took him to a flat for a shower, which happened to be directly above Wallace’s home.

‘He became distressed and said “She lives there, she lives there”. I took that to be the person who potentially attacked him.

‘His eyes were very bloodshot. It looked to me like his skin had been bleached. He said “That bitch did it to me” and said it was his ex.

‘I informed him the police were coming and he said “They need to be there and she needs to pay”.’

Witness Dominic Wooding, who lived in a flat above Berlinah Wallace and Mr Van Dongen, said: ‘A man was in his boxer shorts shouting and screaming. He was in agony and his face was grey and he seemed to have difficulty shouting and screaming.’

Mr Wooding’s flatmate Ellena Ellcocks told the jury: ‘He looked wet or looked like he had been dunked in grey paint or clay.’

Ms Ellcocks said she walked past Wallace’s front door, saw it was open and could see the defendant.

‘It seemed like she was on the telephone and she was speaking in hushed tones and she said something along the lines of “He abused the situation”.’

Another neighbour Nicola White was awoken by screams and went outside to assist, helping Mr Van Dongen into the flat and the shower.

‘The water was dropping off him like the man was waterproof and he was standing there with blood shot eyes and screaming in pain.

‘He said “I told her I was leaving and she did this to me”.’

Wallace, of Ladysmith Road, Westbury Park, Bristol, denies charges of murder on a date between September 22 2015 and January 3 2017 and applying a corrosive fluid with intent on September 23 2015.  She may have been trying to hurt her with it instead, a court heard today.


Women Against Feminism UK: People respond to risk and reward algorithms.  Acid attacks are increasing because the penalties are too low in relation to the utility of throwing acid as a weapon.  It could even be argued that as guns have been removed and knives are being restricted people are merely turning to other means of inflicting harm. What an awful thing to do to somebody. How this doesn’t count as murder is beyond me.

Actions that were completely planned and premeditated, carried out with malicious intent, a history of abusing her partner leading eventually to insufferable injuries and death. I cannot find the words to express my astonishment at there being no murder charge. This does not help victims of domestic abuse gain any confidence in the judicial system. Quite the opposite in fact.

She will not be punished properly for this horrific crime because she is a woman. The classic vagina pass. Feminist will stay in silence as usual. 

Sickening. This young man died while acid was still burning through his bones. No justice. I feel sorry for the victims family. Senile judges and crazy laws makes a complete joke of our judiciary with stupid prison sentences.
Advertisements

Feminist Lunacy: Snowflake feminists want fairy tales changed such as Cinderella because of “sexism” and fairy tales are “offensive”

The Beast might need to read his HR policies

Snowflakes are the worst kind of people ever. It is not a surprise that 100% of them are feminists.

In fact, fairy tales have long been criticised by feminists and snowflakes for reinforcing “gender stereotypes. But another charge has been added to the rapsheet: promoting inappropriate ideas about sexual consent.

The #MeToo campaign inspired the feminist Sarah Hall, 40, to call for Sleeping Beauty to be removed from her six-year-old son’s curriculum. She wrote to the school and said she was “really concerned” about the message her impressionable young son would take from the tale, which features a stranger kissing a woman in her sleep.

From Cinderella to the Beauty and the Beast everything is “sexism” and “rape”.


Women against feminism UK: Our society has got some real issues but snowflakes and feminists find fairy tales offensive and sexist? Really? Strong women that are offended and can not deal with fairy tales?

Their lives must be so easy and boring that they find problems everywhere.

Meanwhile British girls were raped in Rotherham and feminists remained quiet. Why?

What kind of sick society we are living: worried about fairy tales. It is ridiculous.  It is another example of feminist lunacy.

Feminist Lunacy: Feminist “Expert” claims parents should ask babies for permission before changing diaper

Im-going-to-change-your-nappy-now-is-that-okay-ABC-regular-makes-bizarre-claim-that-babies-need.jpg

A feminist sexuality “expert” has said parents should ask babies for their permission before changing their nappies in order to set up a culture of consent from birth.

Deanne Carson, who describes herself on Twitter as a ‘sexuality educator, speaker and author,’ made the claim while speaking on ABC in footage above.

She said she works with children from three years old on issues surrounding consent, but added that parents are advised to introduce ideas much earlier.

Mother-changing-babys-nappy.jpg

On a segment aired on consent laws, she said: “We work with children from three years old.

“We work from parents from birth.Yes, just about how to set up a culture of consent in their homes so ‘I’m going to change your nappy now, is that OK,’ Deanne responded.


Women against feminism UK: Absolute lunacy. The world has gone completely mad. Parents must expose these “experts” and political correctness. 

Maybe her babies can consent (irony) but we think it is impossible. Pretty sure a baby lacks the mental capacity to make such choices about their hygiene and health? What’s about neglect?

So we ask, wait for a minute even though the baby can not respond, and then do it anyway? So you ask consent and then do it anyway. That’s just teaching the child that consent doesn’t matter. Personal hygiene for a baby isn’t a choice or a question. It’s a basic need for their well being. 

Should we ask permission of the ground we walk on before we tread all over it too? Not so long ago, she would have been locked away in some asylum..Now, thanks to political correctness these experts are talking nonsense.

This woman is an expert on babies? What planet is she from? How can anyone earn a living being a supposed expert on this kind of issue. I suppose I have to ask the question does she actually have any children? Most of these brainless freaks don’t. They have no idea of real life and real life situation.

If this doesn’t qualify for Lefty Lunacy…

Racist feminists accuse Bruno Mars of “cultural appropriation”

Related image

By now, you’ve heard the internet’s tectonic plates shifting again. This week, the fault line is Bruno Mars. On one side of the divide, you have people asserting that Bruno Mars is, as a non-black performer excelling at creating traditionally black art, a cultural appropriator. On the other side—a side that seems much bigger today—are Bruno supporters who believe he’s done no wrong.

Bruno is being targeted by a mob of angry black haters. Sensei Aishtemasu, the outspoken writer/YouTuber/activist/feminis who made her opinion of Bruno Mars explicitly clear in the viral clip shared online last week, was faced with a 7-day suspension from Twitter when Bruno Mars’ stans reported her en masse in retaliation.

You can see the idiot complaining about Cultural Appropriation here.

Cultural appropriation is a lie like feminism. It is nonsense.

But who is this SJW? Who is this stupid feminist?  She calls herself Sensei Aishtemasu and she has the gall to accuse Bruno Mars of cultural appropriation. Well, she is black and is not Japanese. Cultural appropriation? This is laughable coming from some who refers to herself as “Sensei”, which is Japanese for teacher or master; Hypocrisy at its finest. Furthermore, she has no clue as to what Bruno Mars’ genetic make up is. His dad is Puerto Rican and a large part of the P.R. population definitely has African ancestry (not that any of that really matters). Good music is good music.

The Bruno Mars Cultural Appropriation Conversation Is the One We Should Be Having

So, basketball, baseball, hockey, tennis, golf, etc.. should have stayed all white for white people to enjoy? Pizza just for Italians? Darius Rucker should not be allowed to sing Wagon Wheel (written by Bob Dylan) and play country music? What if these rules applied and Jimmy Hendrix was not allowed to play rock? Or Tiger Woods was not allowed to compete in golf? Jordan in basketball? Jackie Robinson? Arthur Ashe? These athletes and many others are appreciated by both whites and all other races cause of the way they performed. Should white people look down on black people for the many cultures whites started in this country and others? No matter what your skin color, why stop someone from creating/improving any culture?

This Sensie is obviously racist. Just because your race creates a certain genre in music, does not mean it’s off limits to all others. Yet, it’s ok for all other races to listen, dance and buy the rap, hip hop, R & B music for the black africans to benefit. An example how white and other non-black races are more widely accepting, look at the music/movie/sport industry. May be generalizing here but from what I’ve seen over the years, it seems most black people may only listen to black music, see mostly black movies or wear jerseys of black athletes. Yet, whites and other racial groups are far more accepting to listen to black music, watch black movies and wear black athlete’s sportswear. Why is this? Time to stop making everything so racial and separating your race from others.

The feminist hypocrisy of Katy Perry: the non-consensual kiss on American Idol 

Image result for non consensual kiss on American Idol 

Probably  you saw a video of the feminist Katy Perry fawning over American Idol contestant Benjamin Glaze (19 years old).

We saw the headlines about the non-consensual kiss, we went back and watched the full footage. Well, it is another episode of feminist hypocrisy.

All these celebrities are naked or half-naked “singing” but after few days they are telling us how women are objectified.

They were complaining about men from Hollywood being sexual predators (strangely, after 10 years)  and went crazy on Twitter and Facebook, the #MeToo hypocrisy.

Now we see the feminist Katy Perry acting as a bully and a predator and this footage is clearly a case of sexual harassment.

Imagine if a male singer would kiss (non-consensual kiss) a young girl. It would end in court.

The video starts off innocuously enough, with Perry and the judges inquiring about 19-year-old Glaze’s life, job, and relationship status. Glaze admits he has never kissed a girl because he has never been in a relationship – so how could he have done any kissing?

His explanation is endearing and pure. The judges invite him up to the table to rectify the situation, with Luke Bryan hooting and clapping.

Glaze said no several times: “No, wait, hold on, you can’t, no way.”

Under much peer pressure, he agrees to kiss Perry on the cheek and does so very softly, sweetly and without any sort of gumption. A church kiss.

Perry is not satisfied and asks for one more as Lionel Ritchie starts making smacking sounds and leans in like a coach, showing the young buck how to properly please a lady.

At the very last second, Perry turns her head and steals a kiss on the lips – a non-consensual kiss.

Glaze’s eyebrows are in his hairline; he is laughing along with the group – his big smile an obvious mask for his humiliation. He tries to go along with it.

“Katy!” Glaze calls out admonishingly, unsure of what to do. His hopes and dreams of continuing on American Idol are on the line here and he tries to laugh it all off.

The judges continue talking about Glaze and how he fell down as though he has ceased to exist. Classic bullies.

Glaze tries to come out of the situation on top as a funny guy; he asks Perry how it was and nervously rubs his hand through his hair.

She tells him not to get cocky now and demands he play his song.

On the first strong note his voice misfires and he sings off key. He is eliminated from contention in American Idol.

The whole video is a cacophony of hypocrisy, impropriety, power abuse and bad decisions.

Picture Ritchie kissing a 19-year-old female American Idol hopeful while the other judges tell her, instructively, how to smack her lips.

The billionaire American Idol pop star judge Katy Perry is above asking for consent, is above the law. A man doing what she did would be severely punished.

Bullying, shame, humiliation and power abuse knows no gender.

 

Feminist lunacy and jealousy: Feminists ‘self-identify’ as males… to infiltrate men-only swim session

Amy Desir, 30, wore just trunks and a pink swimming cap to attend a men-only swimming session at a south London pool

Thanks to feminists and transgenders the world has gone completely mental.

First transgender activists made a splash when men identifying as female invaded the women-only pond on Hampstead Heath.

Now feminists have hit back by attending a men-only swimming session in protest over proposals that would make it easier for people to change gender.

Amy Desir, 30 – one of two women to gain access to the South London pool last Friday – caused particular consternation by wearing just trunks and a pink swimming cap.

Another woman, who would only give her name as Hannah because she is afraid of reprisals from trans activists, told staff at Dulwich Leisure Centre that they had every right to join the session because they ‘identified as male’.

Both women used the male changing rooms before joining around 20 men in the 25-metre pool. Ms Desir, a mother of two from Luton, said: ‘We are doing it to highlight the ridiculous and dangerous move towards self-identification.

‘We are clearly not men but by saying we are, we were allowed to join in men-only activities.’

Many of the male swimmers tried to ignore the women but one elderly man asked Ms Desir if she realised it was a men-only night.

She said: ‘He asked me if I knew it was men only. I told him I was a man and he said, “Oh really?” It was a very British response. We are not deliberately trying to offend anyone but raise awareness.’

Hannah, 39, a former civil servant, was accompanied by her husband David, 46, an accountant. She said: ‘I’ve never been an activist and I’m incredibly nervous about doing this but the issue prompted me to take action. It is about safety and dignity – people have a right to segregated areas. It is not enough to say I am a man and use male changing rooms or vice versa.’

Hannah emailed the leisure centre in advance to ask what arrangements were in place for a woman who self-identified as male.


Women against feminism UK: The stupidity of feminists know no bounds. Furthermore, we can see some women (feminists) are obsessed with what men do. There’s a genuine need for men/women only sessions as some of us (male or female) feel uncomfortable half naked amongst the opposite sex. 

But feminists don’t understand that. Their “equality” obsession knows no bounds. They are eliminating commonsense in our society. Some people are scared to talk and expose these movements thanks to political correctness, however, more people see that feminism is a terrible social cancer and must be exposed. Therefore, the movement of women against feminism is growing.

We can see who is privileged here: So what happens when a real man looks at the breasts of one of these idiots. No doubt it would end in a court case. What happens if a real man goes to a only female lesson naked? No doubt he would be in jail.

Feminists are showing a thing with all these nonsense thought: women are privileged. 

Snowball fights banned in British schools: British political correctness/ Nanny State promoting the victimhood culture

Related image

Britain used to be land of heroes, inventors, adventurers and thinkers.

Now we are becoming the land of SJWs, victims and political correctness. British children are not allowed to play with snowballs at schools due to “risk of injury”.

Ges Smith, who runs the Jo Richardson Community School in Dagenham, East London, doesn’t let children have snowball fights because he has a ‘duty of care’ to stop them from getting hurt.

Unbelievable. The world is going crazy. You can see the interview here.

He went on: ‘The rules are don’t touch the snow, if you don’t touch the snow you’re not going to throw it.

‘There’s a thing about being fit for work, being ready for school. If you’re soaking wet and you’re hands are cold you’ve been involved in a fight, you’ve had something thrown at you, if the last thing you did before go.’

Women against feminism UK: How does that protect a child in anyway. You can’t stop a child from touching the snow, that’s ridiculous.

Furthermore, some people want guidelines and policies for that. It is insane, isn’t it?

The fact is: The school are just afraid of being sued, especially in this blame culture. Currently in the UK you can be sued for everything because our legislation promotes the blame culture and the victim card culture. Everything is offensive. It is not a surprise why feminists are still in power here. Same with the ridiculous story about throwing graduation hats into the air in case they injure someone. Things have gone too far though. They’ll be telling pupils not to breathe next in case it causes injury. Health & Safety has gone too far. 

The Nanny State culture is affecting our children. This generation is in danger thanks to this terrible blame culture.

However, the director is not the person to blame. He would be jumped on by the first parent that thought there could be a pay day if poor little “victims” suffered from the emotional torture of being hit by a snowball.

Soon the Royal Marines will be allowed to fire blanks only. Soon the British police must sing “Imagine” to combat the crime while criminals carry guns and knives. We must ask ourselves: What happened to Great Britain?