Feminazi, SJW, snowflakes and socialists are supporting Oprah for American President.
Given that Oprah Winfrey has set herself up as a figurehead for the #MeToo movement, and is even reportedly considering running for president, it is imperative that she disavow serial sex predator and her friend for many years Harvey Weinstein.
Oprah maintained a close professional relationship with Harvey Weinstein over the course of two decades and was caught on camera kissing and hugging the notorious accused rapist at numerous events and award ceremonies.
British actress Kadian Noble said she met Weinstein at a 2014 event in London and that Oprah was “swinging off his arm”. She said that Weinstein used Oprah to lure her in with the promise of boosting her career.
Weinstein subsequently allegedly raped Noble, prompting her to file a sex trafficking lawsuit against Weinstein in a Manhattan federal court in November.
“Harvey wasn’t acting alone. Harvey wasn’t allowed and enabled to do what he did to Kadian and other women without help,” said Noble’s attorney, Jeff Herman.
How can Oprah Winfrey credibly claim to represent victims of sexual assault when she has failed to vehemently condemn Harvey Weinstein and refused to mention his name during her Golden Globes speech?
Who is Oprah, the super feminist?
Oprah told us how to run our marriage but wouldn’t commit to marriage herself. She told us how to raise our kids but never gave birth or adopted kids. Oprah now speaks for Weight Watchers but can’t control her own weight.
Can someone tell us how Harvey Weinstein’s best mate got to be the voice of a movement against the sexual assault of women?
A petition demanding Oprah Winfrey disavow serial sex predator Harvey Weinstein is building momentum, having passed 15,000 signatures in less than 24 hours.
The left media (CNN) posted that some cartoons are fascists. Unbelievable.
CNN clearly in desperate need of a history lesson to understand what fascism actually is and how it manifests itself. CNN, Fascism has a crystal clear definition – it’s the opposite of whatever you like.
Fascism is not about patriarchy etc. Fascism is not about being black, blue, white, red or pink. Fascism includes things like one party government, repression of dissent.
From the Italian creator of fascism (Benito Mussolini): “All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.”
SJWs and feminists are attacking Lewis Hamilton. The British pilot posted that “boys don’t wear princess dresses”. He was talking about his nephew who was wearing like a girl.
Well, the lefties went crazy and are accusing Hamilton of different things.
Britain is getting politically correct obsessed. You can’t call a girl, girl. You can’t call a boy, boy. There is a terrible agenda behind it.
Leftist obsession with emasculating men is old and gross. Feminists demonise men but are the first ones who want to turn women into men. The equality myth is a classic tactic here. There is no man/woman. We all become IT.
So boys being boys is bad, girls being girl is bad but boys becoming girl is normal? What kind of logic is that?
Lewis wasn’t harsh at all he was speaking the truth but this is the left attempt to take away all masculinity from every male and censoring free speech.
If someone gets to adulthood and wants to wear dresses then that’s fine it’s their choice but stop forcing young children into a box where they don’t have a gender . It’s sickening and bordering on child abuse.
Let’s keep it in mind: This agenda will no doubt prove to be harmful to children. The suicide rate for “trans” children is 40%. Not very good odds.
Teaching boy’s to be girls and vice versa will mentally damage kid’s for life. The only one’s that want to see this is less than 1% of the population and their mentally bent supporters. Shame on any parent doing this to their kid’s. Why not wait till their teens to see if they feel gay instead of pushing your view of what they should be on them?
Yet these same people are curiously silent while thousands of children were getting rapped and prostituted in Rotherham, Oldham, etc etc.
We mean am we wrong or does a minor gender faux pas trump mass rape?
If you disagree with Hamilton, fine. But do not demand people be banned from Facebook or fired from their jobs. Acting like that you are not better than Fidel Castro or that North Korean dictator.
Describing herself as a geneticist, Rachael French replied to the tweet with an extended harangue in which she impugned Cain’s motives and derided his understanding of biology.
“Hey geneticist here. You’ve disingenuously and for bigoted purposes oversimplified a complex phenomenon,” she wrote. “A few notes: 1) Sex and gender aren’t the same thing. 2) Chromosomes don’t determine sex.”
“I know high school biology told you they do, but nope,” she continued in a separate tweet. “A single gene on the Y starts a cascade of events involving genes all over the genome to determine sex. If any of those things changes, surprise!”
French went on to differentiate between gender, which she describes as “a complex phenomenon arising from interactions between genes and the environment,” and sex, which “describes the physical manifestations” of that interaction.
“‘Gender’ describes the psychological and/or the emotional identity,” she elaborated, saying, “they’re regulated somewhat, though certainly not entirely, independently.”
“Finally, there are more than two sexes at the somatic level,” she concluded, pointing out that some individuals exhibit physical traits that are inconsistent with their chromosomal sex.
“Intersex and ambiguously sexed individuals arise at an appreciable frequency – on the order of 1%,” she asserted. “This is because physical sex is more hormonal, not chromosomal.”
One user questioned French’s arguments, countering that saying “‘Sex and gender aren’t the same thing,’ isn’t at all a genetic statement. It’s a questionable sociological construct.”
French, however, refused to engage in that debate, citing her academic credentials as a means of dismissing the comment out of hand.
“One thing I am not doing is arguing with someone whose basic premise is incorrect and tries to tell me that they know more about my science, in which I am an expert, than I do,” she wrote.
In a separate tweet on December 24, French added that she teaches “this sex determination stuff” to roughly 200 people every year, and “the gender identity bit” to approximately 40, expressing satisfaction that her response to Cain’s tweet reached “at least five times as many in 24 hours.”
Cain has since made his Twitter account private, but told Campus Reform that the decision was unrelated to the exchange.
Is the UK the new leftist paradise? Unfortunately, yes. Sad sorry state of the UK in 2017.
A math teacher was fired for saying “well done, girls” while talking to a transgender student at an Oxfordshire secondary school in England.
Joshua Sutcliffe, 27, who worked at the school for two years, said “well done, girls” while praising two students in his class. Both students are biologically female, however, one of them claims to be male.
Although he apologized to the student after being corrected, the girl’s parents complained to the school. Considering the parents were the complainants, it’s very likely the girl has simply been forced to live as a boy.
“I was absolutely shocked to be told by the head that I was under investigation. I didn’t know what was happening. It was surreal, Kafkaesque,” he told the Daily Mail. “I had always tried to respect the pupil and keep a professional attitude as well as my integrity, but it seemed to me that the school was trying to force me to adhere to its liberal, leftist agenda.”
During the disciplinary hearing, Sutcliffe was charged with misconduct for “misgendering” the student, and “avoidance of using gendered pronouns,” which the school claims, “contravenes the school’s code of conduct with regard to demonstrating an awareness of [the] sexual and cultural diversity of students and use of insensitive comments towards young people.”
According to the math teacher, no official instructions on how to refer to the girl were given by the school, so he, like other teachers, chose to call the girl by name. He did admit that as a Christian, he avoided using the preferred pronouns of the child.
Sutcliffe’s faith was seemingly another target of the school.
The 27-year-old is also a pastor at an evangelical church in Oxford. He told the Daily Mail that several years ago he conducted a voluntary Bible club during lunchtimes at the school.
Earlier this year, after Sutcliffe answered a question on marriage by explaining that the Bible describes it to be between a man and a woman, the club was shut down due to complaints of homophobia.
Women against feminism UK: There is a liberal, leftist agenda. It is crystal clear. The person who should be tolerant is the one that want us to believe they are something THEY ARE NOT. The leftist world “regime” is just seriously screwing up this planet. Is there anything these half witted twit-weeds won’t call high crimes and misdemeanours? Everything is a damned crisis hinged on race or gender. Why???
How many teachers will start leaving the profession? Where are the rights of the teacher to say whatever he wants to say? So now we all have to live in fear for our jobs when we address someone by wrong gender? What is wrong with people?
This is so wrong on every level and dangerous as well.
Trans people claim they want equal rights and yet here’s another example of them demanding special rights. Had there been one boy in the group he was addressing as girls, would he have been fired for misgendering that boy?
Another question: What the hell is a “boy” doing in an all girls school? If she identifies as a boy he/she has no right being in a single sex school of the opposite gender she/he believes to be, right?
Where are these social justice warriors when Muslims kill gays? Why are these social justice warriors attacking gay conservatives (Milo Yiannopoulos)? The Labour candidate denies the existence of ISIS, so obviously the persecution of Christians is inevitable.
Why can’t it just be considered nice that a woman wants to make her partner a meal?
WHEN young Sydney mother Maddie asked her closed Facebook group of 26,186 mothers for some tasty alternatives to sandwiches for her husband’s lunches, she wasn’t expecting the backlash. She was attacked and abused by feminists.
“I would love to hear what other mums make their hubbies for lunch and snacks throughout the work day,” she posted on Tuesday. “We are getting over sandwiches.”
You would think she’d asked for a hemlock recipe, judging by the torrent of scolding which erupted.
She was nothing but a “slave” and a “1950s housewife”.
She was “weird” and no one in their right mind or a “pink fit” would do something so demeaning as make their husband lunch. Let alone snacks.
“Your husband is a grown up and you’re not his mother”, wrote one member of the North Shore Mums Facebook group.
“My husband can make his own damn lunch.”
“I make my husband the same thing he makes me. Nothing!!”
“Stuff that, hubby is a grown man. I already do his laundry and keep his children alive.”
“Our advice is to stop making his lunches.”
“My role is childcare during working hours and that’s it.”
“He’s lucky if I decide to make dinner some nights”.
“I was married for twenty years and my favourite packed lunch for my husband was called a Get it Yourself with a side order of I’m not your mother.”
“Nope, I didn’t sign up for that at the altar. But in the spirit of being helpful… pickled onion stuffed in mandarins.”
Leader of the attack pack was Polly Dunning, daughter of professional feminist Jane Caro, and mother of a toddler about whom she infamously wrote last year, recounting her horror at finding out she was pregnant with a boy: “I felt sick at the thought of something male growing inside me.”
Dunning told Maddie: “You should pack him nothing for lunch. And you didn’t really ask for advice, you asked what other ‘mums’ pack their ‘hubbies’ (which, to me, is slightly weird phrasing, but whatever).”
Amid the cute pics of babies and birthday cakes, a toxic wave of man-hating feminism is seeping into the world of mothers online.
Where unhappy wives used to confine their bitching about husbands to a handful of girlfriends at Mosman cafes, a new generation of women is oversharing with vast networks of strangers.
On Wednesday, Maddie, 22, switched off comments, but not before page administrators deleted the nastiest.
“I’m actually so devastated about some of these comments,” wrote Maddie.
She and her husband are saving up to buy their first home and, “he works in an extremely physically demanding job, he does housework, he cooks dinner every second night… He gets up in the middle of the night with our Bub. He is a champion.
“The least I can do is make him a bloody sandwich. I love my man, he deserves to eat lunch and we can’t afford to eat out.”
Dunning responded a few hours later: “We are not, any of us, just mums. Mum is one of the many roles we have as women and a role that certainly does not include doing anything for our partners because we’re not his (or her) mother. Just struck me as weird to put making a husband’s lunch with the role of Mum.”
How did making a sandwich become a crime against women? Thankfully, for everything bad about social media there is an antidote, and an army of mums sprang to Maddie’s defence.
“Is it really a massive issue if Maddie wants to make her husband lunch?!?”
“Wow, so much hostility here… Surely nice actions like these get reciprocated in happy marriages.”
“Good on you! My husband is a builder, and his job is so physical, and he is so hands on at home! It’s the least I can do.”
“I never know why these posts always turn into a husband bashing.”
“I think it’s pretty crappy to assume someone is a slave or 1950s housewife for making lunch. Feminism is about choice.”
“All I can say is some women really must resent their husbands by their responses. Looking after your partner is the way to a happy marriage.”
“I’m so confused by the negativity on this post. I love making my hubby lunch… He does so much for us as a family and for my girls I see nothing wrong with wanting to look after your husband!!”
“If I can help in some small part to make his day easier, I will. His hours are ridiculous and if me doing this means he gets to hang out with our son more I am all for it!”
“He does so much for me and the kids. Making two sandwiches a day doesn’t put us in the dark ages.”
“Marriage is a partnership. If only more think like that there will be a lot less divorces in this world.”
This is the truth Baby Boomer feminists refuse to admit.
Consideration and give and take is the secret to a happy marriage, not treating the father of your children like an agent of the enemy patriarchy.
It’s time to end the war of the sexes, even if it means making the odd sandwich.
Women against feminism UK: Feminism is cancer. Feminism does not mean equality between the genders. In fact, feminists blame men and women against feminism for everything. Those feminists are disgusting. Go Girl, and don’t listen to these nasty women.
It shows she loves him and wants to help support him, give and take which all marriages should be. It’s got nothing to do with men and women, it’s about a partnership in which you help each other and love each other. Feminists are hateful and aggressive. Evil souls who want to destroy marriage and families. Lover? They don’t understand what is that.
No wonder men hate feminism so much and more women are fighting against feminism.