Domestic violence against men: Johnny Deep, Will Smith and the Mayor of London.

“NOBODY IS GOING TO BELIEVE YOU’RE A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. YOU ARE A MAN, JOHNNY”.

In one of the audios that was shown to the jury at the trial of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, Amber is heard saying the following:
“Tell the world Johnny, tell the world, I, Johnny Depp, a white man, I’m a victim of domestic violence, let’s see who believes you and how many people get on your side”.

These are the words of Amber Heard.

We posted about it before: Both men and women can be victim of domestic abuse, its not gender specific. Erin Pizzey, an English ex-feminist and men’s rights advocate, domestic abuse advocate, and novelist wrote about this many years ago. For this reasons, feminists hate her. Toxic behaviors committed by women” are oftentimes swept under the rug (feminists to that all the time) and the sad fact is men silently endure these behaviors more than we acknowledge.

Again, feminism is NOT about equality. This is the narrative. The fact is that feminists wants privilege and feminists do hate men. While feminists, “equalitarian”, condemn misogyny (hate against women) the same feminists SUPPORT misandry (hate against men).

As Erin Pizzey explained many years ago, we really hope these incidents with Will Smith and Johnny Deep will bring awareness to men who have suffered from domestic violence. This is why so many men stay silent. Johnny is opening the doors wider for men to come and stand up and say me too. If anything Johnny has shone a very bright and powerful light on Men in toxic relationships, on men being abused, on men suffering at the hands of what looks to be an “innocent” partner, normally toxic and narcissistic women affected by feminism.

The recent cases of Johnny Deep and Will Smith show to society that violence against men IS REAL. Women can be the aggressors and physically assault men using objects or the body and can be manipulative using psychological violence against men. These kinds of women know that that law privileges women compared to men, they use it against men and some men do not react, afraid to be shamed or because they have been told to behave like white knights because women are “delicate, always right and do not make mistakes”.

If these millionaire actors can be victims of female physical and psychological violence, imagine what is happening with the average man, who fight and dies in wars, labour worker, poor educated, who has no legal rights and does the most physical and dangerous jobs, who is invisible and has no power in front of the law?

Regarding Amber Heard: Isn’t anyone curious why she took so many photos and recorded so many fights and conversations? And she never managed to record any time of him physically abusing her even when she taunted him? She knew she was recording so she made sure that she chose her words carefully. It’s like she was setting him up all along when she could have left at any time.

Lastly, some words about the Mayor of London:

Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London, said: “I need to speak directly to men and boys about an issue of immense importance – a matter of life and death. That’s because in this country – and in our city – we currently face an epidemic of violence against women and girls, committed by men”.

Not a Londoner but I think the Mayor should help ALL forms of victims and not just women. Looks like that the Labour Mayor Sadiq Khan thinks men are not victim of domestic violence as the Mayor, and with many male Londoners money, launched a campaign to tackle violence against women and girls. Men and boys when victims of domestic violence, well, he does not care.

Mr Khan should learn more. So throughout the past weeks during the Depp/Heard trial we have learned: bit.ly/37Iuq6T

•Women can verbally assault men in front of everyone and it’s perfectly fine.

•A woman can relieve herself on a man’s pillow and laugh with her friends about it and that’s fine

•A woman can cut off a man’s finger tip in a heated argument and no one bats an eye

•A woman can demand money in a civil setting and claim its for donation purposes and keep it and all is right with the world.

•A woman can gas light a man into believing horrible things about himself that are not true

•A woman can smirk and laugh during court proceedings while a man is forced to relive horrible experiences

•A woman can talk poorly about a man’s kids

•A woman can put make up and finger nail polish on her and the law will pass it off as bruises and blood

•A man can be trauma bonded into submission

•A man can love hard and be fearful of failure and force himself to stay

•A man can battle addictions but like everyone else, cannot do it alone.

•A man can lose his career over allegations but a woman with the same keeps her job.

•A man is not allowed to defend himself in court without harassment

•A man is not allowed to have a fair trial because the judge backs the woman

•A man is judged because he worries how the accusations will affect his children, family, etc.

•A MAN CAN BE A VICTIM OF ABUSE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

The UK is going mad: Feminist snowflakes Cambridge students accuse photographer of sexism

Yeah, this is exactly what happened. Photographer accused of sexism after asking male Cambridge students to ‘help the ladies’.

It is a rite of passage enjoyed by Britain’s brightest minds for generations, but a matriculation at the University of Cambridge has now become the unlikely casualty of “wokery”.

Wolfson College is embroiled in a sexism row after students complained they were “made to feel unsafe” when a photographer for the onboarding ceremony asked “gentlemen to help the ladies”.

Dozens of new arrivals at the mostly postgraduate college were lined up posing in their signature Cambridge gowns on October 10, when the remark is said to have been uttered.

Students at the college, which counts several country leaders among its alumni, have now written a complaint letter seeking a formal apology over the “targeted atmosphere of inequality” which punctured a “safe space for all genders” on campus.

The row began on the evening of the photo, when several of those present raised concern on the Wolfson College Student Association’s 450-member Facebook group about the “gendered language”, leaked to The Telegraph.

They said the photographer, who was an older man, offered to help students dismount from a raised platform and told them: “For any women that are having any problems, there are a couple of gentlemen that are here to help you.”

‘Inappropriate, patronising and unnecessarily gendered comment’

On Saturday, the saga attracted ridicule. Sir John Hayes, chairman of the Common Sense Group of 50 Tory MPs, said: “I’ve no doubt that this photographer’s courtesy represents the civility well known to working-class patriots but clearly unknown to out of touch ivory tower, immature, privileged snowflakes.”

Kate Taṇhā, the women and non-binary officer at the Cambridge Union, the 200-year-old debating society, was one of those who welcomed writing a complaint letter, telling another student “you should totally do that”. She offered to help draft and sign it.

The letter, seen by this newspaper, claims the external photographer’s remarks “are not in keeping with the university’s ethos as a safe space for people of all genders” and created a “targeted atmosphere of inequality”.

The letter said: “Given that the photographer is likely to be in proximity to students again, we ask that this information is passed on to the company to ensure that students are not placed in this position again, where they are made to feel unsafe or subject to discrimination.

“Following the official photograph, one of the photography team announced that students could dismount from the platform where they had stood to pose, and that one of the (male) photography team would ‘help the ladies’ as they were doing so.

“It should not require any explanation as to why this was an inappropriate, patronising and unnecessarily gendered comment to make in this situation.”

‘Language of safety and harm has been hijacked by woke activists’

Wolfson College confirmed it had not yet received the letter and declined to comment. The photography company also declined to comment.

Toby Young, the general secretary of the Free Speech Union, said: “How does offering to help someone climb down from a platform make them feel ‘unsafe’? This is a perfect illustration of how the language of safety and harm has been hijacked by woke activists to enforce their agenda.

“If you don’t comply with every jot and tittle of their rigid ideological agenda, you’re supposedly endangering their lives. It’s utter nonsense.”

It comes after The Telegraph revealed last week how freshers at Wolfson College had been told to complete mandatory anti-racism classes which covered microaggressions, privilege and “whiteness”.

In the lessons, dismissed as “mandatory indoctrination” by Dr James Orr, a Cambridge don, students were told “this is not a debating session”.

Source: https://uk.yahoo.com/news/cambridge-matriculation-photographer-asked-gentlemen-161657117.html

---

Women against feminism UK: Once a brilliant university with brilliant students, the university of Cambridge is not the same.

Is this a clear example of indoctrination? I think it his.

Swedish Scientist Proposes Cannibalism to Fight Climate Change

Swedish behavioural scientist Magnus Söderlund has suggested that eating other people after they die could be a means of combatting climate change.
The scientist mentioned the possibility of cannibalism during a broadcast on Swedish television channel TV4 this week about a fair in Stockholm regarding “food of the future”.

Söderlund is set to hold seminars at the event, entitled “Gastro Summit — about the future of food” where he intends to discuss the possibility of eating people in the name of cutting down greenhouse emissions.

According to his research, the main problem with the idea is the widespread taboo of eating human flesh and said that conservative attitudes could make it hard to convince Swedes at large to take up the practice of cannibalism.

Richard Dawkins

✔@RichardDawkins

Tissue culture “clean meat” already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this.https://ind.pn/2F9xAwS 
What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus “yuck reaction” absolutism.

Lab-grown ‘clean’ meat could be on sale by end of 2018

Meat grown in a laboratory could be on restaurant menus by the end of the year, one manufacturer has claimed.  In vitro animal products, sometimes referred to as “clean meat”, are made from stem

independent.co.uk

2,478

3:15 PM – Mar 3, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

1,709 people are talking about this

Regardless of the likely immense resistance to the idea of eating people, Söderlund said it was important to examine different options in the name of sustainability.

Söderlund is not alone in his call to reject the taboo of cannibalism. Last year, noted atheist and evolutionary scientist Richard Dawkins advocated for lab-grown meat and suggested it may be used to “overcome our taboo against cannibalism”.

Psychologists Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie of Lancaster University also questioned the taboo on cannibalism in an article for Newsweek last month but ultimately did not endorse breaking it.

Cannibalism is not the only “alternative meat” advocated by climate change activists. Many have embraced plant-based meat imitations, while others have put their support behind “meat” made of insects as a way to cut down on greenhouse emissions and save on land and water use.

Breitbart London@BreitbartLondon

Three African Men Arrested for Cannibalism in Paris Suburb http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/21/three-african-men-arrested-cannibalism-migrant-heavy-paris-suburb/ …

Three African Men Arrested for Cannibalism in Paris Suburb

Three men have been arrested in the heavily migrant-populated Paris suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois for attacking a man by biting at his face and then eating the pieces of flesh they had bitten off.

breitbart.com

230

12:25 PM – Feb 21, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

A YouGov poll in the UK found that 37 per cent of respondents thought that the number of food products containing insects would grow in the next ten years.

Last year in the German city of Aachen, shoppers were invited to try burgers made of buffalo worms with mixed reactions from the public.

---

Women against feminism UK: The world has gone mad.

We think that, as a trial, the eco-alarmists should start to eat each other, and then themselves. With them all gone, perhaps we’d stand a remote chance of getting back to normal again, for a while.

Europe is destroying masculinity: Hormone kit helps fathers to “chestfeed” their babies

Some modern women are complaining that cannot find a good man. These women promiscuous, they support feminism and they love LGBT rights in Europe (They remain in silence when Muslims assault and attack gays).

However, when are getting older and want to get married they want a men like “daddy”, the old school man.

The same women support things like that. Read the text below…..”while also questioning gender and parenting roles……”.

Here we go, ladies. You are supporting an agenda that is destroying masculinity. You cannot complain about your future alone, with cats, depression and no family.

---

 

 

Central Saint Martins product design graduate Marie-Claire Springham has invented a hormone kit that enables fathers to lactate so that they can share breastfeeding duties.

Still in prototype stage, the “chestfeeding” kit contains a breast pump, a compression vest and hormones that help to stimulate lactation.

Springham believes that the kit could help to reduce the pressure on new mums while allowing dads to build a better bond with their babies.

Fathers-to-be would take progestin and domperidone

Springham said that the “chestfeeding” process would involve couples signing up to a pre-natal course at the beginning of their pregnancy. Once signed up, fathers would receive a nine-month supply of a drug called progestin, which is currently used as a non-oestrogen-based oral contraceptive pill.

In both sexes, the hormone changes the breast tissue so that milk can be stored. Six weeks before the birth, the father starts taking a drug called domperidone.

Domperidone was originally used to treat gut conditions before it was discovered that one of its side-effects was inducing lactation. The drug is now used by mothers struggling to produce breast milk.

According to Springham, by taking the drugs over the course of nine months, fathers can stimulate ordinarily dormant breast tissue to grow milk ducts that will be ready to produce “chest milk” in time for the birth.

Springham made the design language “less intimidating”

The pump supplied with the kit acts as a regular breast-pump that a nursing mother would use. However, Springham has moderated the design language to make it “less intimidating and more user-friendly”.

It sits flatter to the chest than most commercial products, is operated by a simple hand-pump held to the side of the body and is easy to move around in.

The compression vest is the male equivalent of a maternity bra with a zip down the front for easy access.

“I figured as many chestfeeding dads can grow up to the size of a B cup, they could use the extra support,” Springham told Dezeen.

Chestfeeding kit benefits both sexes

Having discovered that one of the main triggers for postnatal depression in fathers is feeling left out, and that for mothers depression can often be caused by struggling to breastfeed, Springham believes that the kit could have benefits for both sexes.

“The kit began as a piece of conceptual design,” she explained. “I was trying to create an empathy tool to enable parents to support and understand each other better, while also questioning gender and parenting roles.”

Feminist silence and vagina pass: ex-girlfriend threw acid over man. She said ‘If I can’t have you, no-one else can’

We do have some attacks with guns in the UK. Knives? For sure. Acid attacks? Certainly.

Self-defence is always a formidable argument when talking about guns. Sometimes we think it might be a good idea having guns in British soil (currently is against the law). But after second thoughts is clear that is not the best answer. “Why”? Could you ask.

The answer: British people are extremely violent and poor educated when dealing with self-defence. Some Brits can mock our Americans cousins but if  you have been to America you know how they take guns handling seriously. We have got several issues without guns here in the UK, can you imagine it with guns? Pub fights would be fought with guns.

Well, let’s see another case of acid attack. It is NOT a case of self-defence. It is an evil act, however, it shows how people can be cruel if they want and how they will find whatever way to do it if they are committed.

Ex-girlfriend threw acid over man. The man, an engineer who killed himself just over a year after this evil act.

Mark Van Dongen, 29, was left almost unrecognisable after being doused in acid in the early hours of September 23 2015.

His former lover Berlinah Wallace, 48, is accused of creeping in on him while he was asleep and saying ‘If I can’t have you, no one else can’ before throwing the corrosive liquid in his face.

Dutch-born Mr Van Dongen was left blind in one eye, unable to move his body from the neck down and he had to have one of his lower legs amputated.

After 15 months of pain he decided he could no longer take it and died at a euthanasia clinic in Belgium, where his family lived, in January last year.

Wallace, a fashion student, is on trial at Bristol Crown Court for her former partner’s murder.

But jurors heard today there are ‘two sides to every story’ and her defence team claimed Mr Van Dongen had put the acid in a glass so she would drink it.

Adam Vaitilingam QC, prosecuting, told the jury South African national Wallace carried out the alleged attack at her flat in Westbury Park, Bristol.

He said: ‘On September 2 2015, the defendant had bought a bottle of sulphuric acid. She kept it in her kitchen.

‘At around 3am on September 23, as Mr Van Dongen was sleeping in bed, she took the acid into the bedroom.

‘She then went into the bedroom and woke him up.

‘She laughed and said ‘If I can’t have you, no-one else can’, and she threw the glass of sulphuric acid into his face.

‘It covered his face and parts of his upper body and dripped on to his lower body as he moved about.

‘Covered in burning acid, Mr Van Dongen ran out into the street in his boxer shorts, screaming for help.’

A neighbour took him upstairs, put him in a shower and called 999, and he was taken to Southmead Hospital, the court heard.

‘The injuries that he suffered were grotesque and horrific.

‘His face and much of his body was grotesquely scarred,’ the prosecutor added.

‘He lost the sight in his left eye and most of the sight in his right eye. He lost his lower left leg, which was amputated.

‘He was confined to a hospital bed, for a long time unable to move anything other than his tongue.

‘His physical condition improved a little – he regained the power of speech, though never the ability to move.

‘But 15 months later, deciding that he could bear it no longer, he asked a euthanasia clinic in Belgium to assist him in taking his own life.

‘He was examined by three consultants, who confirmed that this was, in their terms, a case of unbearable physical and psychological suffering despite maximum medical support.

‘They agreed the test for euthanasia was met, and on January 2 2017 they inserted a catheter into his heart, which brought about his immediate death.’

Wallace, of Westbury Park, Bristol, denies murder and applying a corrosive fluid with intent.

‘It is the prosecution case that the defendant deliberately threw acid at Mr Van Dongen, intending to cause him serious harm,’ Mr Vaitilingam added.

‘She admits throwing it but denies any intent to cause him harm. She says that she believed that what she was throwing over him was a glass of water.

‘It is the prosecution case that the physical and mental suffering that he sustained from that deliberate acid attack were what drove him to euthanasia.

‘Put simply, he could not bear to live in that condition. If that is right, we say, then she is guilty of murder.’

Later, the jury were shown harrowing video footage where Mr Van Dongen was interviewed by police in hospital.

He confirmed he shared a rented flat with Wallace where they had lived for five years, and that he arrived at about 6pm when she was there.

Mr Van Dongen told police he had been asleep in bed when Wallace woke him up and said: ‘If I can’t have you, no-one can.’

He recalled there being a square plastic box with an inch of acid in.

‘I was wearing just boxer shorts. She threw acid. I was crying “Help!”

‘I was running in the street. Neighbours took me into a house and called police.’

When asked why Wallace threw the acid over him, he said: ‘It was because she was jealous.’

Neighbours in Bristol were woken by the noises of a man in distress and went to his aid, not knowing whether it was a prank or someone on drugs.

Thomas Sweet went to assist and said the man was saying something about having acid thrown on him.

‘It looked like paint and he was talking about acid. I thought he had taken some acid and had been at a rave and had a bad time.

‘He said “I need a shower”. Clearly, he was in a bad way.’

Mr Sweet was joined by other neighbours and they took him to a flat for a shower, which happened to be directly above Wallace’s home.

‘He became distressed and said “She lives there, she lives there”. I took that to be the person who potentially attacked him.

‘His eyes were very bloodshot. It looked to me like his skin had been bleached. He said “That bitch did it to me” and said it was his ex.

‘I informed him the police were coming and he said “They need to be there and she needs to pay”.’

Witness Dominic Wooding, who lived in a flat above Berlinah Wallace and Mr Van Dongen, said: ‘A man was in his boxer shorts shouting and screaming. He was in agony and his face was grey and he seemed to have difficulty shouting and screaming.’

Mr Wooding’s flatmate Ellena Ellcocks told the jury: ‘He looked wet or looked like he had been dunked in grey paint or clay.’

Ms Ellcocks said she walked past Wallace’s front door, saw it was open and could see the defendant.

‘It seemed like she was on the telephone and she was speaking in hushed tones and she said something along the lines of “He abused the situation”.’

Another neighbour Nicola White was awoken by screams and went outside to assist, helping Mr Van Dongen into the flat and the shower.

‘The water was dropping off him like the man was waterproof and he was standing there with blood shot eyes and screaming in pain.

‘He said “I told her I was leaving and she did this to me”.’

Wallace, of Ladysmith Road, Westbury Park, Bristol, denies charges of murder on a date between September 22 2015 and January 3 2017 and applying a corrosive fluid with intent on September 23 2015.  She may have been trying to hurt her with it instead, a court heard today.

---

Women Against Feminism UK: People respond to risk and reward algorithms.  Acid attacks are increasing because the penalties are too low in relation to the utility of throwing acid as a weapon.  It could even be argued that as guns have been removed and knives are being restricted people are merely turning to other means of inflicting harm. What an awful thing to do to somebody. How this doesn’t count as murder is beyond me.

Actions that were completely planned and premeditated, carried out with malicious intent, a history of abusing her partner leading eventually to insufferable injuries and death. I cannot find the words to express my astonishment at there being no murder charge. This does not help victims of domestic abuse gain any confidence in the judicial system. Quite the opposite in fact.

She will not be punished properly for this horrific crime because she is a woman. The classic vagina pass. Feminist will stay in silence as usual. 

Sickening. This young man died while acid was still burning through his bones. No justice. I feel sorry for the victims family. Senile judges and crazy laws makes a complete joke of our judiciary with stupid prison sentences.

Feminist Lunacy: Snowflake feminists want fairy tales changed such as Cinderella because of “sexism” and fairy tales are “offensive”

Snowflakes are the worst kind of people ever. It is not a surprise that 100% of them are feminists.

In fact, fairy tales have long been criticised by feminists and snowflakes for reinforcing “gender stereotypes. But another charge has been added to the rapsheet: promoting inappropriate ideas about sexual consent.

The #MeToo campaign inspired the feminist Sarah Hall, 40, to call for Sleeping Beauty to be removed from her six-year-old son’s curriculum. She wrote to the school and said she was “really concerned” about the message her impressionable young son would take from the tale, which features a stranger kissing a woman in her sleep.

From Cinderella to the Beauty and the Beast everything is “sexism” and “rape”.

---

Women against feminism UK: Our society has got some real issues but snowflakes and feminists find fairy tales offensive and sexist? Really? Strong women that are offended and can not deal with fairy tales?

Their lives must be so easy and boring that they find problems everywhere.

Meanwhile British girls were raped in Rotherham and feminists remained quiet. Why?

What kind of sick society we are living: worried about fairy tales. It is ridiculous.  It is another example of feminist lunacy.

Feminist Lunacy: Feminist “Expert” claims parents should ask babies for permission before changing diaper

A feminist sexuality “expert” has said parents should ask babies for their permission before changing their nappies in order to set up a culture of consent from birth.

Deanne Carson, who describes herself on Twitter as a ‘sexuality educator, speaker and author,’ made the claim while speaking on ABC in footage above.

She said she works with children from three years old on issues surrounding consent, but added that parents are advised to introduce ideas much earlier.

On a segment aired on consent laws, she said: “We work with children from three years old.

“We work from parents from birth.Yes, just about how to set up a culture of consent in their homes so ‘I’m going to change your nappy now, is that OK,’ Deanne responded.

---

Women against feminism UK: Absolute lunacy. The world has gone completely mad. Parents must expose these “experts” and political correctness. 

Maybe her babies can consent (irony) but we think it is impossible. Pretty sure a baby lacks the mental capacity to make such choices about their hygiene and health? What’s about neglect?

So we ask, wait for a minute even though the baby can not respond, and then do it anyway? So you ask consent and then do it anyway. That’s just teaching the child that consent doesn’t matter. Personal hygiene for a baby isn’t a choice or a question. It’s a basic need for their well being. 

Should we ask permission of the ground we walk on before we tread all over it too? Not so long ago, she would have been locked away in some asylum..Now, thanks to political correctness these experts are talking nonsense.

This woman is an expert on babies? What planet is she from? How can anyone earn a living being a supposed expert on this kind of issue. I suppose I have to ask the question does she actually have any children? Most of these brainless freaks don’t. They have no idea of real life and real life situation.

If this doesn’t qualify for Lefty Lunacy…

Racist feminists accuse Bruno Mars of “cultural appropriation”

By now, you’ve heard the internet’s tectonic plates shifting again. This week, the fault line is Bruno Mars. On one side of the divide, you have people asserting that Bruno Mars is, as a non-black performer excelling at creating traditionally black art, a cultural appropriator. On the other side—a side that seems much bigger today—are Bruno supporters who believe he’s done no wrong.

Bruno is being targeted by a mob of angry black haters. Sensei Aishtemasu, the outspoken writer/YouTuber/activist/feminis who made her opinion of Bruno Mars explicitly clear in the viral clip shared online last week, was faced with a 7-day suspension from Twitter when Bruno Mars’ stans reported her en masse in retaliation.

You can see the idiot complaining about Cultural Appropriation here.

Cultural appropriation is a lie like feminism. It is nonsense.

But who is this SJW? Who is this stupid feminist?  She calls herself Sensei Aishtemasu and she has the gall to accuse Bruno Mars of cultural appropriation. Well, she is black and is not Japanese. Cultural appropriation? This is laughable coming from some who refers to herself as “Sensei”, which is Japanese for teacher or master; Hypocrisy at its finest. Furthermore, she has no clue as to what Bruno Mars’ genetic make up is. His dad is Puerto Rican and a large part of the P.R. population definitely has African ancestry (not that any of that really matters). Good music is good music.

So, basketball, baseball, hockey, tennis, golf, etc.. should have stayed all white for white people to enjoy? Pizza just for Italians? Darius Rucker should not be allowed to sing Wagon Wheel (written by Bob Dylan) and play country music? What if these rules applied and Jimmy Hendrix was not allowed to play rock? Or Tiger Woods was not allowed to compete in golf? Jordan in basketball? Jackie Robinson? Arthur Ashe? These athletes and many others are appreciated by both whites and all other races cause of the way they performed. Should white people look down on black people for the many cultures whites started in this country and others? No matter what your skin color, why stop someone from creating/improving any culture?

This Sensie is obviously racist. Just because your race creates a certain genre in music, does not mean it’s off limits to all others. Yet, it’s ok for all other races to listen, dance and buy the rap, hip hop, R & B music for the black africans to benefit. An example how white and other non-black races are more widely accepting, look at the music/movie/sport industry. May be generalizing here but from what I’ve seen over the years, it seems most black people may only listen to black music, see mostly black movies or wear jerseys of black athletes. Yet, whites and other racial groups are far more accepting to listen to black music, watch black movies and wear black athlete’s sportswear. Why is this? Time to stop making everything so racial and separating your race from others.

The feminist hypocrisy of Katy Perry: the non-consensual kiss on American Idol

Probably  you saw a video of the feminist Katy Perry fawning over American Idol contestant Benjamin Glaze (19 years old).

We saw the headlines about the non-consensual kiss, we went back and watched the full footage. Well, it is another episode of feminist hypocrisy.

All these celebrities are naked or half-naked “singing” but after few days they are telling us how women are objectified.

They were complaining about men from Hollywood being sexual predators (strangely, after 10 years)  and went crazy on Twitter and Facebook, the #MeToo hypocrisy.

Now we see the feminist Katy Perry acting as a bully and a predator and this footage is clearly a case of sexual harassment.

Imagine if a male singer would kiss (non-consensual kiss) a young girl. It would end in court.

The video starts off innocuously enough, with Perry and the judges inquiring about 19-year-old Glaze’s life, job, and relationship status. Glaze admits he has never kissed a girl because he has never been in a relationship – so how could he have done any kissing?

His explanation is endearing and pure. The judges invite him up to the table to rectify the situation, with Luke Bryan hooting and clapping.

Glaze said no several times: “No, wait, hold on, you can’t, no way.”

Under much peer pressure, he agrees to kiss Perry on the cheek and does so very softly, sweetly and without any sort of gumption. A church kiss.

Perry is not satisfied and asks for one more as Lionel Ritchie starts making smacking sounds and leans in like a coach, showing the young buck how to properly please a lady.

At the very last second, Perry turns her head and steals a kiss on the lips – a non-consensual kiss.

Glaze’s eyebrows are in his hairline; he is laughing along with the group – his big smile an obvious mask for his humiliation. He tries to go along with it.

“Katy!” Glaze calls out admonishingly, unsure of what to do. His hopes and dreams of continuing on American Idol are on the line here and he tries to laugh it all off.

The judges continue talking about Glaze and how he fell down as though he has ceased to exist. Classic bullies.

Glaze tries to come out of the situation on top as a funny guy; he asks Perry how it was and nervously rubs his hand through his hair.

She tells him not to get cocky now and demands he play his song.

On the first strong note his voice misfires and he sings off key. He is eliminated from contention in American Idol.

The whole video is a cacophony of hypocrisy, impropriety, power abuse and bad decisions.

Picture Ritchie kissing a 19-year-old female American Idol hopeful while the other judges tell her, instructively, how to smack her lips.

The billionaire American Idol pop star judge Katy Perry is above asking for consent, is above the law. A man doing what she did would be severely punished.

Bullying, shame, humiliation and power abuse knows no gender.

 

Feminist lunacy and jealousy: Feminists ‘self-identify’ as males… to infiltrate men-only swim session

Thanks to feminists and transgenders the world has gone completely mental.

First transgender activists made a splash when men identifying as female invaded the women-only pond on Hampstead Heath.

Now feminists have hit back by attending a men-only swimming session in protest over proposals that would make it easier for people to change gender.

Amy Desir, 30 – one of two women to gain access to the South London pool last Friday – caused particular consternation by wearing just trunks and a pink swimming cap.

Another woman, who would only give her name as Hannah because she is afraid of reprisals from trans activists, told staff at Dulwich Leisure Centre that they had every right to join the session because they ‘identified as male’.

Both women used the male changing rooms before joining around 20 men in the 25-metre pool. Ms Desir, a mother of two from Luton, said: ‘We are doing it to highlight the ridiculous and dangerous move towards self-identification.

‘We are clearly not men but by saying we are, we were allowed to join in men-only activities.’

Many of the male swimmers tried to ignore the women but one elderly man asked Ms Desir if she realised it was a men-only night.

She said: ‘He asked me if I knew it was men only. I told him I was a man and he said, “Oh really?” It was a very British response. We are not deliberately trying to offend anyone but raise awareness.’

Hannah, 39, a former civil servant, was accompanied by her husband David, 46, an accountant. She said: ‘I’ve never been an activist and I’m incredibly nervous about doing this but the issue prompted me to take action. It is about safety and dignity – people have a right to segregated areas. It is not enough to say I am a man and use male changing rooms or vice versa.’

Hannah emailed the leisure centre in advance to ask what arrangements were in place for a woman who self-identified as male.

---

Women against feminism UK: The stupidity of feminists know no bounds. Furthermore, we can see some women (feminists) are obsessed with what men do. There’s a genuine need for men/women only sessions as some of us (male or female) feel uncomfortable half naked amongst the opposite sex. 

But feminists don’t understand that. Their “equality” obsession knows no bounds. They are eliminating commonsense in our society. Some people are scared to talk and expose these movements thanks to political correctness, however, more people see that feminism is a terrible social cancer and must be exposed. Therefore, the movement of women against feminism is growing.

We can see who is privileged here: So what happens when a real man looks at the breasts of one of these idiots. No doubt it would end in a court case. What happens if a real man goes to a only female lesson naked? No doubt he would be in jail.

Feminists are showing a thing with all these nonsense thought: women are privileged.